CBI investigation reveals violation of court ban on toxic materials in crackers: Supreme Court


In a March 2020 order, the court ordered the co-director of the CBI in Chennai to conduct a “detailed” investigation

The Supreme Court said on Wednesday that a preliminary CBI investigation into the firecracker industry, including in Tamil Nadu, found a blatant violation of its ban on the use of toxic ingredients like barium and its salts.

In a March 2020 order, the court ordered the CBI co-director in Chennai to conduct a “detailed” investigation. The CBI was tasked with reviewing allegations of violation of the court’s ban in 2018.

The CBI had filed a sealed report in court.

A bench led by Judge MR Shah, referring to the contents of the report, observed that a chemical analysis of samples of finished and semi-finished firecrackers and raw materials taken from manufacturers showed a barium content.

The court said bulk quantities of barium had been purchased in the market. The firecracker lids did not indicate the dates of manufacture or expiration.

The court discussed reasons why manufacturers should not be asked to justify why contempt action should not be taken against them.

“Celebration every day”

“Every day there is a celebration, but you also have to pay attention to the people who live around you… People with asthma,” Judge Shah noted.

The court posted the case for a new hearing on October 6.

Tuesday, the Supreme Court At first glance brushed aside manufacturers’ claim that thousands of employees made a living in the industry.

Judge Shah retorted that “we must find a balance between employment, unemployment and the right to life and health of citizens. We cannot sacrifice the lives of many for the few. Our main goal is the right to life of innocent people.

The case rose to prominence with the start of the wedding season and festivals like Dussehra and Deepawali. “Every day there is a violation in this regard (…) in religious processions, political rallies,” said Judge Shah, accompanied by Judge AS Bopanna on the bench.

He noted that the court should determine the responsibility of the competent authorities. “Sometimes we have to lay down the blame. If the police commissioner is adamant about the responsibility, only then will all this happen. “

Source link


Comments are closed.